Mafia 7: Snakes & Zombies on a Plane Mafia - Tie!

[i2i Killer 89]

It's these posts that are making you more suspicious in my eyes. You have just told us about 10 times that you've been innocent in every other game and that is somehow meant to make me believe that you are innocent in this game?

You may be innocent, you may be guilty. At the moment it's 50-50 for me because I don't actually know but I just have a feeling that you're trying a bit too hard

[fozza gump zzz]

ok currieman. can u remember the game which i mentioned in my post. the one where i begged and pleaded with everyone not to vote me off. u were the deciding vote in that if u remember correctly. so u r the one who killed me effectively and i was innocent. like i said. i dont really give a shit any more.

[dotLeo]

Previous game roles don't count for anything now though, stop living in the past.  I'm inclined to think, like Currieman said that you are trying too hard. 

SVH's comment about a deadline strikes me as suspicious - although the first day is a drag, people do say a lot which can be useful later earlier on when we know more about the roles of those dead (kicked off).  It's a pain that it goes on a long time, but it's got to be done.

FOS Fozza
FOS Steve Van Halen

[Steve Van Halen]

Suspiscous cos I want the game to get going? Fuck yeah thats suspiscous


Im guilty as fuck

FOS dotleo cos ive never seen this guy on the forum before. Local forum for local people 

[stevenryals]

lets think about this logically..

Steve van halen suggest a couple times for a nolynch verdict.  In the past 8 games we lynched an innocent on day 1.  So, this may not turn out to be a bad idea, although I think this is a bad idea after only 7 pages of posts(123), we dont have enough information available for day two yet, but on the other hand, doing a nolynch verdict would really only help the mafia.  I think that if we do a nolynch verdict it should be after say, 250 posts or so, otherwise we will still be wondering what's going on during day 2.  I, however don't think this suggestion implicates him as mafia, only that we are all clueless and he doesnt want us to lynch an innocent. 

Yorkshire_Blue sure has gotten quiet lately?  anybody seen him on the board lurking??

HappyAxeman, I agree that Amadjin looks like he is just playing dumb, but I fos'd him in the last post... and that still stands.

Dotleo hasnt been doing much posting either??

Fozza, seems like you are trying very hard to declare you innocence, but i'm inclined to think you are innocent, who would, on day one, declare thier innocence so much after just 1 vote.. mafia would lurk in the background and hope that the pressure passed, and then after 4 or 5 votes then start declaring thier innocence...  But with fozza, I have no record to go by as he's always been innocent, so no past games to judge by..... so i'm confused on this one....  Are you really innocent, or are you riding the innocence of past games through to the next round?


-steven
(hammer I pm'd you with a role suggestion)
(I just found out that my cell phone doesn't work in my house!! Shit)
and now I'm back to organizing my place.. woopy!!  be back later

[i2i Killer 89]

I still just think Fozza is trying too hard. Just because you were innocent in the last game doesn't make you innocent in this one.

You may be innocent but everything you're doing is making you look evil in my eyes

[sweeney]

anyone who is pointing the finger at me is making a mistake and is more than likely a zombie or a snake

(sung in blues styley)

my woman she left me (dum dum dumdum)
and im felling kinda blue(dum dum dumdum)
so if i see a snake or zombie come near me,
shoot the i will, its true.

cos im a human on a plane
just tryyyyyiiinnng to escape my pain
yes im a human on a plane
and im taking the muverfukin blame. and you know its true

Not that I needed a further excuse to vote for Billy, but that was sooo bad, it tipped me over the edge.

Vote Billyman

By the way, as I have now voted for Billy, I am either a snake or a zombie. Very clever psycology that, in trying to put people off voting for you by making them think that they will in turn be voted for so they will not vote for you.

Nice try

[billyman]

raygyn you have just admitted you are evil so

unvote : quigg

vote : raygyn

 

 i should point out that i am drunk and may not od read his post correctly

[Quig]

Vote: Billyman because he is trying to hide any mistakes he might make by playing drunk.

[stevenryals]

Billyman,  I think your little song there was a cover to make it look like a good long post, but with no real information. I think you are evil and this may actually be your first time, so you don't tknow what to write, and you don't want to look suspicious.  I believe you have ducked out for a while once the heat got on, and doing so with the hopes that your name wouldnt be brought up any more.  

I will wait for your response before voting for you, since you're my guitar buddy, but, it better be good or you get my vote too.  

-steven

[billyman]

playing drunk

2 cans carlsberg
1 bottle 13.5% red wine
1/4 bottle of whisky


banging headache, believe me i was pretending

steve, just because someone posts doesnt mean they are guilty

fos steven
fos quigg

[yorkshire blue]

we should put a limit on the first day cos this is takin too long theres loads of post and were no where near finishing the first day

[dotLeo]

Vote yorkshireblue

You have an uncanny knack of pointing out the obvious without really saying anything else.

[yorkshire blue]

and votin me is gettin us alot further in the day

[dotLeo]

Well it would if you were voted off.  I don't see you bringing much to the game, so regardless of whether you are innocent or not we are better off without someone that doesn't contribute.

Luckily votes are retractable though, just in case.

[hippo]

It's a bit rich complaining the game's not moving along if you haven't contributed to moving it along in any way, shape, or form.

unvote billyman
vote yorkshireblue

[Steve Van Halen]

I didnt ask for a no lynch verdict i asked for a deadline to the first day so that its over and done with otherwise it drags on and people lose interest.

If there was a deadline we even if half the players didnt vote there would be a lynch instead of waiting for a bandwagon to start.




the cats in the bag and the bags in the river

[froganomis]

hows this for a night out

4 cans of guiness
1/4 bottle of aftershock
2 pints of B52 (kahlua and baileys)
a further 2 pints of guiness
a pint of becks and a 7 mile walk home....
the look on my mates faces when i got home before they did-priceless

theres a shit load of accusations goin round,what i dont get is why billys bein targeted for being drunk,its a way of life innit...nothing wrong with that,so its a lame excuse to vote for him,the only thing i find suspect is his deleted post...

has everyone apart from me been told the difference between the zombies and the snakes?

the reason for this post was because of the way fozza had posted,it was as tho there was nothing wrong with snakes,im sorry buts its not just zombies we gotta get off this motherfuckin plane!so in my eyes your suspicious

also my suspiscions are cast over manic who appears to be lurking....come out manic...or you got something to hide?

thats just 2 of my suspisions....

[hippo]

Decent pick up on fozza there, amadjin. I think if you'd worded it in that way in the first place, it could have moved us a long a bit quicker. There's a couple of things about fozza's day that have made me slightly suspicious. But i'm not sure. Here's the things that bother me anyway.

a) People who start getting frustrated so easily at people even daring to vote for them, and start saying how everyone always accuses them, are usually guilty. It read like desperation to me. Trying to convince people to change their minds. I don't think an innocent person would care so much that one or two (it wasn't much more than that) had accused them.

b) When i agreed with him on a couple of points, he latched on to it. Apologising for mentioning me, and trying to get me on side. In argument against this though, if he's searching for an ally, it doesn't indicate he has a group with him. Unless they're going all out to not mention each other.

c) Listing past mistakes of lynching him seem to indicate that he is evil. Again, it looked like desperation.

[hippo]

Also, another point. There are nearly always comments like this made on the first day..

thats what i have been saying, it seems the more you post the quicker yer out while the snakes who are hiding get away with it

..and we always lynch somebody who isn't posting, and i think it's worked once (and that was when the person hadn't been on the forum in days). The majority of people will have been evil at some point or other by now so this myth about hiding should be not here anymore. Here are some points that you all know are true..

> If you get an evil role, you do not post less than before.
> You try and post in the same way as you usually would where possible, to avoid suspicion.
> You do not leave the outcome of the lynch to chance as it could easily be you. Especially if you've gone against the first rule of being evil.
> You will influence the lynch somehow.
> You generally will not accuse too many people.
> Those who you do accuse will either have accused you, or already have been accused by someone else.

Generally anyway, these are what you do. Everyone has their own way, but i think it's a completely false that people not posting are the ones to lynch. I think our record of success should prove this. It's only random to accuse someone who hasn't even looked at the thread. Otherwise, lynching for low posting rates is accusing someone who is innocent. Unless they always have a low post rate.

People will say: "They don't post so they're not helping the game to have them in." This should be interpreted as "they're not here, so i don't want to waste a night kill on them, can you kill them in the day please? so i can use my night kill on somebody who's a threat to finding me out."