Haha, crikey, mike.. feathers ruffled much?
So now you backtrack and add that? Why not say that at the time after slating others for doing so?
No, i didn't slate you did i? I merely pointed out that there was no point in saying what you said. You can't say TP looks most suspicious, and then say that's normal, because that's contradictory and doesn't mean anything. You need to pick up on players indvidual styles to acknowledge what is and isn't suspicious - if Stevenryals posts alot, that's not suspicious; if YB posts alot, that is. If i post some bizarre crap that makes no sense, that's suspicious; if TP does it, that's normal. He can't be the "most suspicious" in your eyes, if he's doing nothing different. It makes no sense.
Seems to me you are singling people out with no substance or then adding it after for doing exactly what you are doing.
The idea of voting for someone randomly, is that it opens up a dialogue with that person, in which you exchange a few posts and try and work each other out. I'm not gonna say all of the minimal stuff i have to say to Currieman in the first post am i? Or that'd be it. One post, he defends, end of dialogue and no pressure applied. As it happens, that's what'll happen now, but that's your fault, rather than mine.
Obviously there's little substance to what i put in my first post, because it was my first post, on page two and hardly anyone had said anything for me to use to provide any substance. Hammer voted for someone for not being Spartacus early on.. would you have reacted to that too?
You seem somewhat too defensive over just being mentioned briefly in a post? I mean, i mentioned ryals as much as you, and he hasn't kicked off about it. Just looked back and you've never been mafia before have you? Maybe that's the reason for your over-defensiveness? Interesting.
