So after all that Hippo you decide to vote for Currieman after slating other people for saying somebody is suspicious without adding any substance? Then you go and do exactly the same.
Strikes me as you trying to single out people already with no foundation then go and do what you tell other people not to do.
FOS Hippo
No, i "slated you" for saying you thought TP looked the most suspicious, before going on to explain that he always plays like this, and therefore you don't think he's suspicious at all. It's essentially the same as saying nothing. You've contributed something, then immediately withdrawn it by counter-arguing the point yourself.
"The mafia will probably be posting rubbish to make it look like they're posting", as Currieman put it.
If you really want to know, i voted Currieman because he said that about the game, and offered nothing new himself. He pretty much recycled something Axeman had already said, and he's a better player than that. And he only offered an FOS, during what's supposed to be the random voting phase.. for an experienced player, i found that weak and non-committal.
