Author Topic: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD  (Read 148242 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #300 on: August 17, 2006, 08:09:47 PM »
your a bit of a mad sod aint ya...if i came back negative it means some of us are having screwed up investigations,i mean i investigated fozza n it came back guilty...and apparently he wasnt,so dont jump the gun,and whats with the bomb shit?

sweeney

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #301 on: August 17, 2006, 08:31:25 PM »
Only time will tell with that statemen.

Offline stevenryals

  • A true blue from across the pond
  • I am the Law
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11142
  • Karma: 47
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #302 on: August 17, 2006, 08:38:03 PM »
If you investigated Fozza and he came back Guilty, then please answer the following:


1: Why was your first FOS on Billy and I?
2: Why was your Third FOS on Dotleo?
3: Why did you vote for Dotleo? ?? (who had done nothing wrong really)
4: Why didn't you FOS Fozza first thing, or at least mention his name, or acknowledge he was playing??
5: Why did you do a quick vote on a random guess(Dotleo), when you had a guilty verdict on someone?


You didn't even MENTION Fozza until after I posted a post about his suspisions (the one that was about 10,000 words).  After that you said, something to the effect of "After reading steve's post, I have to FOS Fozza".


-Steven

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #303 on: August 17, 2006, 09:19:41 PM »
DOTLEO said im not an independant thinker...which strongly suggests to me hes part of a team.....this coupled with the attack on billy for no reason,that is why i voted dotleo

the answer to 1 was because i did a day investigation fozza well after accusing you two

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #304 on: August 17, 2006, 09:20:29 PM »
and the latter part of the first thing was my reason for FOSin dot in the first place

fozza gump zzz

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #305 on: August 17, 2006, 09:21:50 PM »
well well well. steven up to his old tricks. now everyone knows i was innocent. Just a little tip for everyone. I've played 7 mafia games and i have NEVER been evil. NOT ONCE. Yet i have never made it to the end of the game. I believe that this time it was all down to a certain person who i wont mention

STEVEN FRIGGIN RYALS

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #306 on: August 17, 2006, 09:23:05 PM »
and the reason i didnt say anything to do with fozza was because i didnt want to give the game away i could investigate so early in the game,so get off my case...i cant handle much more questions :D

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #307 on: August 17, 2006, 09:24:01 PM »
and considering your just an ear,you cant half manage to talk well....

Offline stevenryals

  • A true blue from across the pond
  • I am the Law
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11142
  • Karma: 47
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #308 on: August 17, 2006, 09:29:46 PM »
THE DEAD SPEAKS AGAIN!!!  I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT IF YOU IMPLODED, YOUR VOCAL CHORDS WOULD BE MANGLED SOMEWHAT..  :)

Amadjin: you had daytime action and you used it on someone you hadn't even suspected?  Why not use it on Dotleo before you cast a quick vote?

-Steven

dotLeo

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #309 on: August 17, 2006, 09:32:07 PM »
So much has happened, it's hard to know where to start!

Wouldn't mind hearing from Der Hammer and Manic if they are allowed to speak some more. 

Just a suggestion, but everyone seems to have overlooked the possibility of people being neutral (whatever that means!), fozza was, so likely that there are other people.  Maybe an assult was a neutral action to help get things moving.  This isn't standing up for EvilWeasel, just in case you think I am siding with him because I too am eveil I am going to FOS EvilWeasel

Maybe the thing that was made in the night was able to help heal Amadjin, or probably not if there is a doctor anyway. 

If we try and consider that of the two killings, at least one was a mafia killing then one of the two were likely innocent, maybe even both..  I would love to read back through the entire thread with this in mind to try and gain some more insight but not tonight lol..

Warning - while you were typing 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

I'll not bother reviewing it, but rather post again if need be!

Offline stevenryals

  • A true blue from across the pond
  • I am the Law
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11142
  • Karma: 47
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #310 on: August 17, 2006, 09:35:19 PM »
Dotleo, Good point, I think I'm 100% sure that Der Hammer and Manic were both positively good guys, and they were killed in the night. 

You will see on day 4 when thier orientation is revealed.  So go ahead and do your research.


-Steven

dotLeo

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #311 on: August 17, 2006, 09:37:53 PM »
DOTLEO said im not an independant thinker...which strongly suggests to me hes part of a team.....this coupled with the attack on billy for no reason,that is why i voted dotleo

I said that with my tongue firmly in my cheek hence then ':P', and you are reading far too much into it. Lame excuse, so I am going to...

FOS Amadjin

Offline stevenryals

  • A true blue from across the pond
  • I am the Law
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11142
  • Karma: 47
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #312 on: August 17, 2006, 09:49:19 PM »
(I'd just like to point out that yorkshirblue was here on a number of occasions today, the latest was only minutes ago... yet no posts.. just throwing that info out there for processing)(and yes, I am very bored today)(no, not as bored as last friday)(but close)


froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #313 on: August 17, 2006, 10:10:38 PM »
because on the first day id prefer to know about more than one person steve and i decided a random investigation was ok for the first day,but obviously iv done wrong by not saying anything,so i guess its my bad,but then again it was a good job i didnt cos id have got it wrong wouldnt i,and i'd be in a similar situation right now

dotLeo

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #314 on: August 17, 2006, 10:12:37 PM »
if you've done all these investigations then amadjin - care to share the outcomes with us please?

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #315 on: August 17, 2006, 10:18:41 PM »
i just said id done one,i was only allowed one,and all i got was a guilty on fozza,which turned out to be completely wrong...

Offline Happy Axeman

  • City till it kills me
  • The Gaffer
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11847
  • Karma: 150
  • Smile, Be Happy
    • Happyaxeman.co.uk
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #316 on: August 17, 2006, 10:36:26 PM »
IF THE DEAD DONT STAY SILENCED, I WILL TAKE YOUR SOUL...

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #317 on: August 17, 2006, 11:25:40 PM »
Right, i'm pretty drunk, but here are my thoughts on the day so far.

Firstly, it's a bit weird that there has been no speculation at all about that big bomb that apparently went off, who did it, and why.

Secondly, evil weasel said that assaulting stevenryals would prove one way or another, what he was. I see nothing that indicates this was the case. Apart from the fact that he's voted for him. But this hardly tells us anything because he did this before the assault as well. I strongly suspect evil weasel now.

fos evil weasel

Thirdly, hammer made me chuckle with his snakes on a plane joke.

Fourthly, why is stevenryals 100% that manic and hammer were innocent. Hammer was one of my 'probably innocents',  but you yourself questioned something manic did yesterday. What completely changed your mind? You're also probably innocent though. I dunno. I'll post again in the morning.



Offline Happy Axeman

  • City till it kills me
  • The Gaffer
  • Community Star
  • *
  • Posts: 11847
  • Karma: 150
  • Smile, Be Happy
    • Happyaxeman.co.uk
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #318 on: August 17, 2006, 11:40:05 PM »
I WOULD LIKE TO CLEAR ONE THING UP, NEUTRAL MEANS THEY ARE GOOD, AND ARE HUNTING EVIL. THEY ARE NEUTRAL, BECAUSE THEY CAN BE SWAYED IF SUCH A SITUATION ARISES. IF THERE GOOD, THEN THEY CANNOT BE SWAYED CAUSE THEY ARE TRUE GOOD, LIKEWISE IF YOUR EVIL, YOU ARE TRULY EVIL!

the computer screen refreshes

Story so far...
GAME UPDATE
Deaths:
Fozza - Shadow Master: Neutral GOOD
ManicMonkeyMan:  revealed day4
Der Hammer: revealed day4

there has been 9 investigation attempts.
there has been 2 people protected.
there has been 4 recruit attempts.
someone had made something.
2 people were healed.
there has been 2 kill attempts.

DAY 3
There are 9 alive.
It will require a maximum of 6 votes to make someone enter the door...
Otherwise the Majority goes through...
Or Something Else happens...

People with votes against there name:
Evil Weasel x3(x1 FOS VOTE, Billyman, YorkshireBlue)

Prime suspects(FOS):
EVIL WEASEL x4 (StevenRyals, Raygin Bull, Hippo, DotLeo)
YorkshireBlue x1 (billyman)
Dotleo x1 (billyman)
ChurchofHalo x1(Amadjin)
Amadjin x2(StevenRyals, Dotleo)

People Who Have voted:
Billyman, YorkshireBlue

People not voting:
Evil Weasel, Dotleo, Amadjin, StevenRyals, Hippo, ChurchofHalo, Raygin Bull

People Who Have Used All FOS's:

please enter your action>
« Last Edit: August 18, 2006, 01:22:21 PM by Happy Axeman »

dotLeo

  • Guest
Re: Axe Mafia 1: EVIL vs GOOD
« Reply #319 on: August 18, 2006, 12:29:26 AM »
ahh, thanks for clearing that up - presumably a recruit attempt is trying to sway a neutral either way - 4 attempts is quite a lot, could alter things drastically if they were all one way!

btw, axeman I also fos'd amadjin which you haven't recorded above ;)  cheers