Heated debates? I accused him briefly because of something amadjin did. He stated a few times he thought i was probably innocent, he was correct. If i was anti-town i would not kill off a townie who thought i was innocent - they'd only be of use. Hagler also wouldn't have been a target of mine, i posted accusing him and he got a vote off me. These deaths are clearly not the work of me, i would not kill people i was linked to - it would be obvious. I AM a townie.
Manic's post there would be better read as follows: "I'm voting hippo because he just accused me of being the serial killer."
And gravey, it's not old ladies arguing. It's me showing people that amadjin jumped on three innocent bandwagons. If none of you find that suspicious then fair enough. I wasn't trying to start a bandwagon, i was trying to help people make an informed decision as to who to vote for.
I don't know why emilou FOS'd me, once again, she posted without any real reference to the game. Fair enough if shes been off and hasnt had chance to read it yet but that still wouldnt explain it.
Weasel, if i really wanted to cover something up in this game, i wouldn't draw attention to myself with so many posts. It wouldn't exactly be hard to just not post and survive. How would be being the "chief accuser" be a good mafia tactic? It makes people vote for you just because you've accused them. I'll probably get lynched today. I don't even mind if i do, as long as you lot just look at who voted for me once i'm proven innocent and pick one of them to vote for next day.
You don't post at all you get lynched, you post you get lynched. You post two votes a day, no content to them at all, you just get to survive til the end. That's a bit of an odd way to go about it.
