Author Topic: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game Over - Town Won  (Read 251517 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #220 on: April 30, 2006, 02:08:18 PM »
People who were on both i'd say are the most suspicious. These are Amadjin, Currieman, Raygin and Manic. Three of these (amadjin, currieman and raygin) were also involved in the attempted bandwagon of no lynch.

Now, i'd say it was highly likely that the three who were in all of them are a mafia. Began with tactics to try and exploit the innocent bandwagoning of amadjin last time and get everyone to go with no lynch. If that failed, see a bandwagon and jump on it. Standard anti-town tactics.

Manic could also be in this mafia, he may just have joined in with the game after the no-lynch attempt had failed. . Either that or, more likely, he is the serial killer. A role i've suspected him as being since he claimed that the serial killer was a pro-town role.

sweeney

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #221 on: April 30, 2006, 02:23:50 PM »
People who were on both i'd say are the most suspicious. These are Amadjin, Currieman, Raygin and Manic. Three of these (amadjin, currieman and raygin) were also involved in the attempted bandwagon of no lynch.


Utter rubbish, I was and never wanted to be associated with the "no lynch" brigade as it serves us no purpose. Read back and check your facts before you start tarnishing me with other peoples :shit: So taking me out of that equation, 2 is hardly a "bandwagon" is it ::)

It is a big blow for us to lose two in one night so we have to be uber careful in who we lynch this time around as we'll be left with only a handful of us :'(

How can you be so sure that Crow was going to be replaced? What if Hammer couldn't find a replacement? It is all a bit of speculation on your part unless you are talking "outside" these boards which leads me to suspect that you may know a hell of a lot more that you are telling. :o

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #222 on: April 30, 2006, 02:44:36 PM »
Sorry, i was confusing you with church of halo on the no lynch vote thing. But you were on both the other bandwagons.

And saying "2 is hardly a bandwagon" isn't anywhere near the point i was making. No lynch was a bandwagon, Hagler had a bandwagon against him, and crow certainly did. I'm not claiming these people make up the whole of the bandwagon. Obviously townies voted for hagler and crow too. The fact that there are people that were on both of these suggests to me that they were looking for a bandwagon to get on. And the two of them who were on all three clearly were.

Even if you didn't vote no lynch, you can hardly rubbish the rest of my points. Which i think makes you even more suspicious - why would you blatantly ignore some decent evidence?

Accusing me of being suspicious on the basis of knowing that crow would be replaced is a bit desperate isn't it? I shall explain how i know he would have been if you want. I said to hammer, and i quote, "you gonna replace crow if he doesn't start posting soon?". You'll love the next bit, this is where i got really perceptive. He said "yeah."

That's hardly breaking any rules or being suspicious - unless you're just looking to incriminate someone because you've been rumbled. But you wouldn't be doing that, would you?

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #223 on: April 30, 2006, 02:54:41 PM »
why are you continuin to make up complete bollocks about me?All i can see at the moment is you trying your damndest to set me up,hags n happy were now doubt killed to make me look even more suspicious(i wanted hags dead anyway,cos hes a cunt lol,and then out of nowhere he dies....and happy(from his posts)i got the feeling he was telling the truth,so i assumed his innocence,and then look hes dead too...)

it is clear to see that i am being framed i mean c'mon, if i was mafia i wouldnt go out of my own way to make myself look even more suspicious,so seriously,get real....

i also see youve come up with even more fucked up shit to try n lynch me,because amadjin is indecisive he is mafia...well hippo secretly wears his mothers clothes,therefore hes a cuntmafia,see both statements mean fuck all....
i am not mafia!

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #224 on: April 30, 2006, 02:57:41 PM »
So what you're saying is that i'm mafia, i have 2 night kills and you weren't at all involved in any of those bandwagons?

sweeney

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #225 on: April 30, 2006, 03:23:27 PM »
Sorry, i was confusing you with church of halo on the no lynch vote thing. But you were on both the other bandwagons.

And saying "2 is hardly a bandwagon" isn't anywhere near the point i was making. No lynch was a bandwagon, Hagler had a bandwagon against him, and crow certainly did. I'm not claiming these people make up the whole of the bandwagon. Obviously townies voted for hagler and crow too. The fact that there are people that were on both of these suggests to me that they were looking for a bandwagon to get on. And the two of them who were on all three clearly were.

Even if you didn't vote no lynch, you can hardly rubbish the rest of my points. Which i think makes you even more suspicious - why would you blatantly ignore some decent evidence?

Accusing me of being suspicious on the basis of knowing that crow would be replaced is a bit desperate isn't it? I shall explain how i know he would have been if you want. I said to hammer, and i quote, "you gonna replace crow if he doesn't start posting soon?". You'll love the next bit, this is where i got really perceptive. He said "yeah."

That's hardly breaking any rules or being suspicious - unless you're just looking to incriminate someone because you've been rumbled. But you wouldn't be doing that, would you?

So me not backing you up on some of your opinions makes me suspiciuos :o We've only had 1 day which makes it just that much more diffucult to try to asses what roles people have been given and get rumbled.

As for the bandwagons, my first post I suspected Hags of being dodgy after reading his posts as I couldn't understand why someone would "do a Currieman" and come out and say they are the cop, therefore pretty much committing suicide. I only changed to Crow as we weren't really getting anyway and we were successfull in our previous lynching of a no poster so there was a possibility that we might get lucky again. It backfired.

I don't think that too much can be taken from the Crow lynching. I voted for Crow because we were going round in circles and was getting bored of day 1 as we were just repeating ourselves.

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #226 on: April 30, 2006, 03:34:56 PM »
This is what you lot keep saying "we can't know peoples roles yet because we've only had one day", we've had 11 pages of people talking, if you haven't formed an opinion on what you think at least some people are by now then you never will.

And we can't take anything from crow's lynch? Why not? A townie, like me, will realise that the mafia are going to be in there somewhere. If it's not mafia you're lynching, you can guarantee that they'll have voted for whoever is being lynched.

My point about you lot being on the bandwagons holds validity. Even if it turns out to be wrong, it's still the most conclusive bit of evidence i've seen. If someone presents something that's better i'll take that on board. But amadjin's "it's a conspiracy, the whole world against me" type response and your "that's utter shit" one did nothing to change my mind.

sweeney

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #227 on: April 30, 2006, 03:54:16 PM »
I wasn't trying to change you mind with that statement, just pointing out it wasn't me :P :D

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #228 on: April 30, 2006, 04:03:12 PM »
You're high up on my list of suspects, but amadjin has been far and away the most suspicious. I am convinced, and this vote is highly unlikely to change.

I've presented what i believe to be proof, he has done no such thing in return. About anyone.

vote: amadjin

Quig

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #229 on: April 30, 2006, 04:34:58 PM »
Hippo seems to have a very valid point in that voting for Crow was possibly the most retarded possible thing anyone could of done. Any mafia delights in the sight of a bandwagon being formed and will jump on it with haste. I for one welcome good and new ideas with open arms. Vote: amadjin because of his bladent bandwagoning and his shitty reason of explaining himself. You basic said your either a townie who is being framed or we have a very stupid mafia with you in it. And I believe its the latter.

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #230 on: April 30, 2006, 04:47:06 PM »

My point about you lot being on the bandwagons holds validity. Even if it turns out to be wrong, it's still the most conclusive bit of evidence i've seen.

so you dont care if your wrong? thats mafia talk if ever i heard it,.your making yourself a more likely candidate for mafia with each post.For example,the above quote by you.and i never said the whole world was against me,what i said and meant was that the mafia are conspiring against me,so if you want to go ahead and include yourself in that bracket,fine.

And your pretty shallow minded if your suspicious of me for changin my mind like the wind,the mafia are much more devious then we seem to think we know.

and so the blatent bandwaggoning begins on me again...i wasnt hasty to jump on either of the three times i changed my vote,so read through what you said again quig...and its a valid reason to explain myself,but if you dont see through the shit in your eyes,then fine let the mafia join the wagon again

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #231 on: April 30, 2006, 05:12:54 PM »
It doesn't say i don't care, it says me voting for you is fully justified based on the evidence within these pages. I might be wrong, i don't know, like i say, i don't know for certain anyones role.

What do you want me to base my votes on? You jumped on 3 bandwagons - all of which were beneficial to the mafia. Coupled with my earlier suspicions, i can't see how i can not vote for you.

If i'm a candidate for mafia more and more with each post then vote for me. Lynch me. It won't have the result that makes you look any less like mafia though.

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #232 on: April 30, 2006, 05:31:00 PM »
how was i to know until this day that id made bandwagon jumps that helped the mafia?you know a man cant be right all the time,and seeing as no other people are posting anything worth reading im gonna continue to be a main suspect and thats what the mafia want

sweeney

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #233 on: April 30, 2006, 06:12:26 PM »
Hippo seems to have a very valid point in that voting for Crow was possibly the most retarded possible thing anyone could of done. Any mafia delights in the sight of a bandwagon being formed and will jump on it with haste. I for one welcome good and new ideas with open arms. Vote: amadjin because of his bladent bandwagoning and his shitty reason of explaining himself. You basic said your either a townie who is being framed or we have a very stupid mafia with you in it. And I believe its the latter.

Who's quick to jump on the bandwagon now :o

And you have the benefit of hindsight with a statement like "as possibly the most retarded possible thing anyone could of done". If we had been right like last time it wouldn't have seemed retarded would it ::)

Not thinking for yourself and letting Hippo make all the moves leads me to believe that you two are in cohorts with eachother and decided for yourselves that you would make Amadjin the next bandwagon cos you are both mafia.


Quig

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #234 on: April 30, 2006, 06:25:25 PM »
I said it was retarded before we know he was innocent. A lucky retards still a retard. Also, bandwagoning would be voting for someone simply because everybody else is. I explained a reason and voted. By your logic anybody who votes the same as ANYbody else is guilty. Good one Watson.

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #235 on: April 30, 2006, 06:49:40 PM »
Not thinking for yourself and letting Hippo make all the moves leads me to believe that you two are in cohorts with eachother and decided for yourselves that you would make Amadjin the next bandwagon cos you are both mafia.

I'm actually offended you'd think that if i was mafia (and i'm not) i'd use possibly the worst attempt at tactics ever thought of.

froganomis

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #236 on: April 30, 2006, 06:59:09 PM »
and thats gonna sway his opinion?i have said the exact same to you

hippo

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #237 on: April 30, 2006, 07:27:03 PM »
I don't think yours were that bad though - if you are mafia. You alligned yourself with someone who was innocent in a suspicious way - if he'd have got lynched (he already had a few votes) and turned out to be innocent you'd be pretty much untouchable for the rest of the game. If it was you who got lynched from it then you'd have guaranteed it was an innocent linked with you rather than your colleagues. One kill your mafia would have, you use it on axeman, it proves you to be right all along and appear innocent. They're flawless. The whole hagler getting killed thing is irrelevant because you wouldn't have done it. You have one kill.

And the bandwagon wasn't obvious, you did it in the middle of them. You made sure it wasnt you who did the accusing and that it also wasn't you who came in with the dodgy last votes.

I still don't think you've justified why you assumed axeman was innocent; that doesn't go away just because it turned out you were right. Like i've said, that makes it worse because you apparently did know he wasn't mafia.

There are more people i find suspicious, it's not a war against you like you're making it out to be. I've already mentioned 4 people today - you, currieman, raygin and manic. And i'll add to that if you like. Fozza Gump, Classydaz and Steve Van Halen. All didn't post much and joined in with bandwagons when they did. Classydaz with the suspicious killer vote on the lynch. Quigmaster also, maintained his vote of hagler after he'd revealed as cop.

I just think you're the most suspicious. That's why you have my vote. Do some investigative work, convince me someone else is mafia rather than just making flimsy accusations and i'll reconsider my position.

Offline Sir Villain

  • Monster Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3628
  • Karma: -13
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #238 on: April 30, 2006, 09:14:58 PM »
Votes
     
2- Amadjin (Hippo, TheQuigMaster)

Not Voting: ManicMonkeyMan, Billyman, Steve Van Halen, Evil Weasel, Raygyn Bull, Currieman, ClassyDaz UK, FozzaGump, Amadjin, Evil Sooty, Emilou, Gravey, ChurchofHalo, Ray Von Chong

9 Votes for a Lynch

A lot of people silently viewing.......

Hagler and Axeman =  :dead: :buck2:

Mafia =  :tooth:

David Brent =  :guitar:

RayVonChong

  • Guest
Re: Mafia 3 - The Simpsons Mafia - Game in Progress
« Reply #239 on: April 30, 2006, 09:27:38 PM »
Vote: Hippo (far too many posts for a regular townie)