Author Topic: AxeMafia2: EVILvsGOOD : EVIL WINS (Read 311537 times)

stevenryals · « **Reply #200 on:** May 20, 2009, 09:01:34 PM »

HEY!!!

WES x2(Footynewb, StevenRyals)
SVH x1 (Amadjin)
STEVENRYALS x1(Wes)
FOOTYNEWB x1(manic)
MANIC x1(MIASG)
AMADJIN x1(Currieman)
CURRIEMAN x1(MikeBlue)

Steve Van Halen · « **Reply #201 on:** May 20, 2009, 09:17:25 PM »

slightly over agressive there wes, calm down! I didnt agree with steve at all, just commented on your vote on him

stevenryals · « **Reply #202 on:** May 20, 2009, 09:19:20 PM »

Quote from: Steve Van Halen on May 20, 2009, 09:17:25 PM

slightly over agressive there wes, calm down! I didnt agree with steve at all, just commented on your vote on him

what post is over agressive?

Steve Van Halen · « **Reply #203 on:** May 20, 2009, 11:13:57 PM »

the one where he abused me! :'(

MIASG · « **Reply #204 on:** May 20, 2009, 11:58:59 PM »

Quote

Quote from: MIASG on Yesterday at 12:08:51
well it's not like you answered me either .. and I wouldn't want to answer it either if it were asked of me .. I think we need to concentrate on the people not playing and why that is .. obviously you've said you have reminded bluestars so you think she has time .. amadjin and manic have been on today and not posted .. all 3 aren't playing town type roles by hiding in the background if you ask me.

Quote from: MIASG on Yesterday at 09:54:39
and what's yours steve? maybe you don't know and what to find out

Quote from: stevenryals on May 20, 2009, 02:46:46 PM

his might not have been as obvious.. but he sure made a fair crack at it..

look I've still got 2 pages or so to read but I couldn't see how I was defending wes as such - all I was saying here was that you ask me and I'm not telling you .. I haven't come out against you full on have I steven? and why might that be? becasue I don't know what wes is and I don't know what you are .. just becuase you use the phrase good role means shit to me .. maybe it's true or maybe it's the opposite to what it truely written .. the game is evil vs good so you didn't have to think to hard on this one .. in all probability your probably on the same side and just picking away at each other - which enables others myself included to comment .. I've tried to look at other people whilst this has gone on .. now I'm going to read on and see what the go is ..

MIASG · « **Reply #205 on:** May 21, 2009, 12:15:16 AM »

well not much else occured then really apart from some bets and to me 1 glaring mistake .. both are trying their best to sound convincing .. and Wes there's no mention of town at all in this game only good vs evil .. I think your clutching for straws as basically you've said your town ..

I go back to page 1

Quote from: Happy Axeman on May 15, 2009, 12:52:11 PM

I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THIS IS NOT A NORMAL MAFIA GAME. AS SUCH ITS NOT MAFIA YOUR TRYING TO FIND, ITS PLAYERS YOU THINK ARE NOT GOOD.

and read the opening post from Happy ... there is no mention of town and I think the whole game is around good vs evil not town vs evil

UNVOTE Manic and VOTE WESMANCITY

and doesn't mean I'm convinced your 100% good either Ryals but I'm now 100% sure Wes isn't "Town" or Good.

MIASG · « **Reply #206 on:** May 21, 2009, 12:16:36 AM »

WES x3(Footynewb, StevenRyals, MIASG)
SVH x1 (Amadjin)
STEVENRYALS x1(Wes)
FOOTYNEWB x1(manic)
AMADJIN x1(Currieman)
CURRIEMAN x1(MikeBlue)

6 votes for a lynch

Tommy Caton's Hairstylist · « **Reply #207 on:** May 21, 2009, 12:45:44 AM »

wow a lot of Wes/Steve arguing to go through, can we just let the train go ??!!

But not wanting to blow Steve's claim out of the water but i do not have the words 'good roles' i have something else 'good ......... ' So either Axeman has varied it in his pm's or your claim is incorrect.

Maybe yours Steve says 'you win when all the good roles are dead ?'

But Wes could have done the same and disputed your claim and didn't really so not sure where i stand on this. We go back and read through again, see if anything else stands out.

MIASG · « **Reply #208 on:** May 21, 2009, 01:48:01 AM »

does yours say town though TCH? Wes is saying his says neither evil or good but town .. to me that is an obvious mistake born out of frustration

Tommy Caton's Hairstylist · « **Reply #209 on:** May 21, 2009, 03:46:00 AM »

no mention of 'town' only 'good'

MIASG · « **Reply #210 on:** May 21, 2009, 04:02:13 AM »

exactly my point

wesmancity · « **Reply #211 on:** May 21, 2009, 08:53:52 AM »

Quote from: Steve Van Halen on May 20, 2009, 11:13:57 PM

the one where he abused me! :'(

give over lol, im sorry!

wesmancity · « **Reply #212 on:** May 21, 2009, 09:03:30 AM »

It looks like this lynch is heading in my direction all i can say is that Im deffinatly not evil, bad mafia what ever you want to call it.

I investigate people and it doesnt say what side im on which confuses me, all i can be is good for the town/good to find to bad people.

If you lynch me then its your choice, I can also protect myself at night so im not affraid to give you abit of info from my role.

MIASG · « **Reply #213 on:** May 21, 2009, 09:12:59 AM »

how can you be neither good/town or evil/bad ? it's Evil vs Good look at the title ? I'm sorry Wes but I'm not buying it .. votes staying on you

wesmancity · « **Reply #214 on:** May 21, 2009, 09:31:49 AM »

Quote from: MIASG on May 21, 2009, 09:12:59 AM

how can you be neither good/town or evil/bad ? it's Evil vs Good look at the title ? I'm sorry Wes but I'm not buying it .. votes staying on you

more fool you, you will see when i get lyinched how wrong you are and how i dont bull shit.

stevenryals · « **Reply #215 on:** May 21, 2009, 01:55:14 PM »

tbh, this kinda blows.. i was banking on axeman using the same phrase on all the good roles PM's, people reading their PM's and confirming that I was good & the fact wes has said his role doesnt say that was an indication of evil..

TCH your's said good.. mine says good.. mike has agreed 100% that his says that (which may be a coverup, considering he jumped right in behind me "totally" as he stated)...

axeman said to go after those who were "NOT GOOD", and my role says that i win when only "good roles remain"... Wes has admitted that his role doesn't say good..

so.. for me that's conclusive.. I'm not sure what his role is.. or if he could actually be helpful to the good roles.. but from his mouth, he says his role doesn't say "good".. so eventually we have to get rid of him in order for the good to win this game.. does that make sense to anyone but me?

bluestarsneyes · « **Reply #216 on:** May 21, 2009, 02:08:44 PM »

After reading all these pages some interesting details. I noticed a few differences in play this game...but out of the gate Wesmancity was at almost everyone....and with complete bizarre logic....then after reading back to Wes's reaction to the question of whether it said he was good or evil....it's hard to deny...he ain't good.

I am especially as convinced that Miasg is with you somehow because of that post about not concentrating on Wes having to answer the questions but rather focus on people not posting....that's just clear...how can you focus on players that aren't playing when you have someone that when asked point blank...are you good or evil..and can't give an answer that you go focusing on someone else!

I think you are in a corner Wesmancity and I don't like the constant threats you like to add....you'll be sorry...you will regret it....doesn't sound like a good person desperate to make a case to be honest...sounds more like evil caught and knowing they have no BS left to dig out.

I mean maybe I'm thick but I'll take the chance....this whole game so far Wes you've gone after people but not inquired much...just attacked and then back off...attack and then back off..just suspicious even for you. It's simple you answered the question for us....you didn't say you were good...if you aren't good then what are you? Maybe playing for one?

VOTEWESMANCITY

Mikeblue · « **Reply #217 on:** May 21, 2009, 02:12:53 PM »

Quote from: stevenryals on May 21, 2009, 01:55:14 PM

tbh, this kinda blows.. i was banking on axeman using the same phrase on all the good roles PM's, people reading their PM's and confirming that I was good & the fact wes has said his role doesnt say that was an indication of evil..

TCH your's said good.. mine says good.. mike has agreed 100% that his says that (which may be a coverup, considering he jumped right in behind me "totally" as he stated)...

axeman said to go after those who were "NOT GOOD", and my role says that i win when only "good roles remain"... Wes has admitted that his role doesn't say good..

so.. for me that's conclusive.. I'm not sure what his role is.. or if he could actually be helpful to the good roles.. but from his mouth, he says his role doesn't say "good".. so eventually we have to get rid of him in order for the good to win this game.. does that make sense to anyone but me?

Makes sense to me. I hardly followed you. I was on to him from very early. I have voted for Wes then Currie and now I am changing it back to Wes. VOTE WESMANCITY. Can I not agree with you or is that sus lol. Think we are off to a winner he town. Currie and MIASG will have a lot to answer for 2moro if we are right.

MIASG · « **Reply #218 on:** May 21, 2009, 02:20:17 PM »

Quote from: bluestarsneyes on May 21, 2009, 02:08:44 PM

I am especially as convinced that Miasg is with you somehow because of that post about not concentrating on Wes having to answer the questions but rather focus on people not posting....that's just clear...how can you focus on players that aren't playing when you have someone that when asked point blank...are you good or evil..and can't give an answer that you go focusing on someone else!

in English

are you saying I'm with wes or you agree with me ?

Quote from: Mikeblue on May 21, 2009, 02:12:53 PM

Makes sense to me. I hardly followed you. I was on to him from very early. I have voted for Wes then Currie and now I am changing it back to Wes. VOTE WESMANCITY. Can I not agree with you or is that sus lol. Think we are off to a winner he town. Currie and MIASG will have a lot to answer for 2moro if we are right.

fair enough but why? because I didn't believe steve? I still don't and I don't trust you either or TCH with your "good" claiming .. they way they kept at each other one was going to make a mistake sooner or later you just have to fan the fires sometime .. I think it's pretty funny how Steven and Mikeblue seem to trust each other .. are you saying if then Mike if Wes was proven right then you 2 are up as targets? I think are more substantive targets either way tomorrow than all 4 of us

WES x 5(Footynewb, StevenRyals, MIASG, Bluestarsneyes, Mikeblue)
SVH x1 (Amadjin)
STEVENRYALS x1(Wes)
FOOTYNEWB x1(manic)
AMADJIN x1(Currieman)

6 votes for a lynch

Remember if someone else votes for him stop typing and PM Happy ..

Mikeblue · « **Reply #219 on:** May 21, 2009, 02:30:36 PM »

Quote from: MIASG on May 21, 2009, 02:20:17 PM

in English are you saying I'm with wes or you agree with me ?
fair enough but why? because I didn't believe steve? I still don't and I don't trust you either or TCH with your "good" claiming .. they way they kept at each other one was going to make a mistake sooner or later you just have to fan the fires sometime .. I think it's pretty funny how Steven and Mikeblue seem to trust each other .. are you saying if then Mike if Wes was proven right then you 2 are up as targets? I think are more substantive targets either way tomorrow than all 4 of us

WES x 5(Footynewb, StevenRyals, MIASG, Bluestarsneyes, Mikeblue)
SVH x1 (Amadjin)
STEVENRYALS x1(Wes)
FOOTYNEWB x1(manic)
AMADJIN x1(Currieman)

6 votes for a lynch

Remember if someone else votes for him stop typing and PM Happy ..

I believe Steve to have a good role yes. How else would he know about the PM thing? It was worded different this game to usual games. Steve would not know what the good one said if he did not have a good role himself. I knew what mine said so to me this is proof that Steve has a good role same as me. Wes side stepped the question over and over again simply because he didn't know what it said and couldn't exactly just guess at it could he. You can Currie blatantly came on and tried to help WES out and draw attention away from him with various posts you made. You know which ones so I won't drag them up unless I have to. You trid to help him out of a hole. Why do this if you are not with him? Surely if you were town you would be wanting the answers from him not letting it slide and diverting pressure away from him and trying to give him options out?

News:

Author Topic: AxeMafia2: EVILvsGOOD : EVIL WINS (Read 311537 times)