so you say mopheads more suspicous than currieman.......... ........because mophead hasnt contributed much, then that makes him suspicous... so currieman is equally as inactive yet he isnt as suspicous to you.......... mmmmmmm sticking up for your mafia pal then maybe 
1, I never said that Mophead was more sus than Currie, so you are putting words in my mouth.
Currie at least trys to contribute to the cause and all i said about Mophead was that hes doing very little for us as a town with his rubbish posts. Do you not agree?
2, I asked you a question about why are you keen to lynch Currie and you havent answerd the question, so to me you are now trying to avoid the question, or is it the fact at you dont really no why you are keen to lynch him?.
3, the fact that you have completly ignored my questions and the fact you dont know why you want currie lynched means you are skimming.
This now makes me think you are deffending mophead with your deffencive post's.