How is telling you what i "WOULD" have done (not did do), suspicious?
I didn't communicate with anyone before this game, because it's not in my role. I simply offered an insight in to what i would have done if i was mafia. I wouldn't explain what i'd do if i was mafia, if i actually was, because it wouldn't be in my best interests to do so would it?
How many "slip-ups" on day one did you all find during my 3 game stint as godfather? First sign of any attention and i'd have done a Mikeblue and completely disappeared, but i haven't done that. I've answered everyones questions openly and honestly. I can do that, because i've got nothing to hide. If that's suspicious enough for votes, you probably want to have a look at how you analyse people.
Slightly off-topic bit about the rules
Hammer, who introduced the game to this site, told me at the start of my first game when i asked "is it ok to talk now then?" upon receiving my role, that it was fine as this period was to be regarded as "Night 0", where people with roles permitting it can communicate, but nobody can use actions (unless stated). If that changed at any point, then i think it should have been explicitly stated in the rules somewhere. If i missed that happening, fair enough, i DID communicate before any game in which i had a communicative role during the 14 previous games i've played. I didn't in this game, because i don't have a role where i have anyone to talk to.
Does this revelation blacken my name then?
