Vote Currieman the reason for this is because you are trying to camoflage (spelling) yourself by taking you sig of and your avatar, this is a good tactic to be unnoticable mafia trick.
That's the thing bluestars is on about you i think, Wes. Or seems to be, i'm a bit confused by the argument you two seem to be having to be honest. Bluestars is very suspicious, but for the reasons steven is stating, not the ones you are.
I think she interpreted this as you saying it's a tactic that is unnoticeable to people who aren't mafia, whereas i think you were saying it's a mafia trick to remain anonymous (for the record, changing their avatar was an awful reason to vote for currieman.. i must have missed that before). And then this her saying you said you were mafia, i don't think was supposed to be taken quite so literally.
On to real reasons though. She definitely has changed her gameplay, and that's highly suspicious. Fair enough if she's busy, but she had enough time to post that last long rant. Could be a genuine reason - those statistics must take ages to sort through (hammer can't even be bothered to do a current vote count, let alone compile statistics on everything anybody has done
) - but then, could be a cover up. Maybe she's done something already that would be a clue and doesnt want it getting out? Or her mafia colleagues may have? Which'd probably be this defense of her by amadjin.
And despite his denials, i'm pretty certain i'm right about what amadjin was doing with that jokey post, so my vote's staying there. He seems to be defending bluestars pretty strongly too.. i understand him finding stevenryals suspicious, and maybe he's just unwilling to believe anything he says because of that, but it seems to be a bit bizarre to be protecting someone so much on day one, unless you know what they are.
