DAY3 of the current mafia game; Evil v Good... Estimated time left is a few days!New game starting after current one finishes...Sign up for it now!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So now you backtrack and add that? Why not say that at the time after slating others for doing so?
Seems to me you are singling people out with no substance or then adding it after for doing exactly what you are doing.
so.. do you understand the game we're playing here BBM?
You seem somewhat too defensive over just being mentioned briefly in a post? I mean, i mentioned ryals as much as you, and he hasn't kicked off about it. Just looked back and you've never been mafia before have you? Maybe that's the reason for your over-defensiveness? Interesting.
Haha, crikey, mike.. feathers ruffled much?No, i didn't slate you did i? I merely pointed out that there was no point in saying what you said. You can't say TP looks most suspicious, and then say that's normal, because that's contradictory and doesn't mean anything. You need to pick up on players indvidual styles to acknowledge what is and isn't suspicious - if Stevenryals posts alot, that's not suspicious; if YB posts alot, that is. If i post some bizarre crap that makes no sense, that's suspicious; if TP does it, that's normal. He can't be the "most suspicious" in your eyes, if he's doing nothing different. It makes no sense.The idea of voting for someone randomly, is that it opens up a dialogue with that person, in which you exchange a few posts and try and work each other out. I'm not gonna say all of the minimal stuff i have to say to Currieman in the first post am i? Or that'd be it. One post, he defends, end of dialogue and no pressure applied. As it happens, that's what'll happen now, but that's your fault, rather than mine.Obviously there's little substance to what i put in my first post, because it was my first post, on page two and hardly anyone had said anything for me to use to provide any substance. Hammer voted for someone for not being Spartacus early on.. would you have reacted to that too?You seem somewhat too defensive over just being mentioned briefly in a post? I mean, i mentioned ryals as much as you, and he hasn't kicked off about it. Just looked back and you've never been mafia before have you? Maybe that's the reason for your over-defensiveness? Interesting.
that's another point.. I've been going over old games looking at the way Mikeblue has come out of the gates simply because he went on and on about never being evil while we were in Portsmouth... In previous games first couple (real) days... he says things jokingly like "i see you're looking for an easy ride to day 2 again , mafioso!!" and "FOS Sir hammer, villian.. or whatever you call yoru self these days, do you change your name so people don't associate to all your evil roles?? one onders".... and the longest it's taken him to say 'i'm town in the one again" or "i'm always town" or ... whatever.. as far as i can tell.. is 5 pages.. then he gets 2 or 3 votes on him and he goes quiet until someone else gets lynched... in this game.. however, in this game he seems to have come out with a more scathing approach, pointing the finger, trying to wind people up... whereas in the past he's been more "jokey" on day 1.... So, it seems that something may be different with mikeblue this time around..
This time I tried to avoid that so I people wouldn't give it the old "oh he has showed up and posted, but has said nothing and is making no effort to find anything out etc etc."
Then you say not to post without giving reasons
Where exactly did i say that then? That's made up isn't it?What has happened is this:- I tried to kickstart the game a bit, mentioned a few people (including you), voted for someone- You FOS me- I re-explain my point about TP, and as requested, give a reason for picking Currie for my test-the-water vote.- You vote for meAt no stage have i said "don't post without reasons". What i said is, don't say someone looks suspicious and then follow it up with something like "but that's normal". It doesn't put any pressure on them, and like i explained a couple of times, it's as good as saying nothing. I don't see why me pointing this out has made you so angry, but it has. Like i said, ridiculously touchy.As for the other bits of your rant..- Why would i come out and accuse people to divert attention away from me, when no-one had even mentioned me?- I'm not trying to make anyone play like anything, i've explained what i was doing. The fact that i've said i was looking for reactions, and you've continued to give one, makes me chuckle.- Hippos don't have feathers.
it's not strange if you consider the psychological effect on a person who's evil and trying to portray someone who is not... your sub-concious will constantly steer you wrong, so you have to correct things mid sentance in order to seem like your town.. Maybe you meant:This time I tried to avoid that so I don't get lynched...This time I tried to avoid that so I don't look like mafia...This time I tried to avoid that so I can wear a wig...This time I tried to avoid that so I don't have to eat nails...I dont know what you were going to say, and it doesn't even matter really, but you were going to say something else, and edited yourself in mid-sentance.. for me that's enough at this point to vote for you...
Nobody else wonder why StevenRyalls has posted less than he ever has in his life in this game? Yet he is bombarding every other thread on the board?
You did not give any reasons for voting someone, then after I asked why you did, then you explain... I questioned that when you had slated me and others for pointless posting when thats exactly what you had done before you came on again.
You basically slated people and me for posting stuff without reasoning or for saying sum1 was sus. I found this sus after you did the exact same.
it's only page 3 mike. and already there are only 3 people playing.. so.. you can expect yours, mine & hippo's post count to sky rocket... seeing as everyone else is just enjoying the show at this point..
WTF?That is the lamest reason I have ever seen for voting someone lol. Worse than the line spacing one I think. PMSL
To be honest I can slightly see you point.
I've explained why it wasn't pointless though haven't i? What would Currie have done when he saw my vote? Questioned it; we'd have interacted, and i'd have attempted to work him out during that. What's TP gonna do when he sees what you wrote? Nothing, he'd ignore it. That's the difference between being pointless, and being Hippo. What else could i possibly do at this stage other than say something, and hope someone reacts to it? It's worked look. I still don't know why you got involved though.Oh FFS. Seriously? For the last time, i said nothing of the sort. Vote without reasoning this early if you want. Say somebody's suspicious. Don't follow this up by saying something that lets that person completely off the hook though. Because it's pointless and get's no one anywhere. It puts no pressure on them, and helps the town not even slightly.I'm not typing anything else to you about this though, 'cause i kind of suspect you're just saying the same incorrect things deliberately and repeatedly, so us three fill up a page, and everyone skims it.
Actually Mike, what's strange is your flip-flopping...gone from the lamest reason ever with PMSL WTF and 3 laffy smileys.. to:Drastic change in my opinion..
You don't want to talk about it anymore because you can't really explain your logic adn your double standards. Well my vote is sticking with you, and Steve your bully buddy ain't far behind!