Okay. I just want to say before i start, yorkshire is the person i'm most suspicious of, and i don't want that to be lost in this whole axeman stuff.
Axeman:
In response to your points..
1) I said nothing about time spent online or whatever (i know weasel did, calm down), and that's not at all why i find you suspicious. Like i said to stevenryals when he used that as a defense as well, it's not how often you post that i'll point out, it's how you do it. If, like you and ryals have said on numerous occasions, you don't have as much time, then i won't use that as a reason - if you're yorkshire and clearly are just lurking until you get voted for then what i've said doesn't apply.
2) If you've said that before somewhere then fair enough, but how'm i supposed to know that? You didn't say "splinter skel doesn't want to post, hammer maybe you can look for a replacement or if not, i'll vote for him anyway". You said maybe he's forgotten, which hardly implies that i should realise you've had a conversation and know his exact attitude towards the game does it?
You also say i'm being aggressive with my accusations. In what way? I've made observations about people and submitted the doubts i have. I've been fair i think. If not, fair enough, point it out. Your post right there is the aggressive one, for no apparent reason, other than that people find you suspicious? And in a game where the idea is that everyone posts their suspicions, it's a bit unreasonable isn't it? If i'd focused on you and only you, i'd understand a petulant response, but i haven't; no one has.
Becoming suspicious of the person who looks to be pro-actively trying to find people out. Good work. Not at all saying you're suspicious of me because i mentioned you in my post? I didn't even accuse you properly.
