Yeah, I have only posted so much because people are directly talking to me. The way to flush out lurkers is with votes, Currieman
and Yorkshire, Im not trying to get Hippo to change his rules. They are set and are good rules, its just how we choose to use them. I have played in games with this system in the past and the tryed and tested way is to set a few basic guidelines designed to help and protect the King.
What about these then?
Suggestion One-The King may only execute players if the town has at least given that player 33% of the votes (we can keep a running list for "executable players" or something)
Suggestion Two-The King must execute a player if the town gives them 66% of the votes (or an otherwise overwhelming majority, we may change the percentage at the town's discretion)
Suggestion Three-The King may execute a player if there is direct (investigative, most likely) evidence against that person, even if that person has not reached 33% of the votes
apart from our votes seem pointless,there is nothing to go by,therefore theres no point to posting pointless shit
Thats exactly why im trying to set up the Guidelines. You could have said what you think about the main argument of the day, whether or not we should use it?
I don't want people to post pointless shit, just to say what they think about the posting that has already happened.
Unvote:Amadjin