Most likely 2 vs 2
I'm still not convinced MIASG is good.
Going back to night 1.
There were 3 actions with no kill.
2 people were blocked Zulu and MIASG.
They both claimed they didn't perform an action.
It has now been confirmed that Zulu was good, so I don't see why he would have lied about not performing an action.
So seeing as I blocked MIASG, that must mean he is evil and lied about having an action on night.
Not to mention his incredibly poor play and mistakes right from the start which I always thought made him stand out as evil.
Now looking at night 2.
4 actions were carried out and 2 people did nothing.
TCHs character name Norman Townie kinda denotes that he was nothing and had no actions.
But that doesn't rule out the possibility of him receiving something that allowed him to perform an action before he died.
Say he did perform an action. Then only 2 others were able to perform actions (because 2 people did nothing) with 1 of them having to perform 2 actions.
If he performed 2 actions. Then 2 others performed an action each.
If he didn't perform any actions then 3 people performed 4 actions between them with 1 of them performing 2 actions.
I didn't receive anything that allowed me to perform an action last night.
From steves posts in the last day phase I believe he is good and probably performed multiple actions, he said he was able to choose from multiple actions and he also received a trophy which may have allowed him to perform an action.
As stated above and all through the game, I think MIASG is evil and his action last night killed TCH.
I thought laser was good, but if it's down to 2 vs 2 then powers of deduction would mean he's evil.
Unless there was only ever 1 evil player to begin with...
Which very well could be a possibility with all the other crazy things that Happy has thrown in.
Whether it's 2 vs 2 or 3 vs 1... I think the greatest threat to us is MIASG, even if laser is evil, we will win as it will be 2 vs 1.
VOTE MIASG