Wow, now that changes things quite a lot. So basically Amadjin is tied to another player. I'm not 100% sure who it is but I'd guess that it's Bluestars? However that could just be a load of rubbish and he's trying to keep himself alive by making out that he's a pro town role tied to someone else like a mason group that all dies together or something.
As for Axeman's vote on me, I was joking in that thread that got deleted. I had no idea whether MiasG is mafia or not, I just said he was, he said he wasn't and I agreed. How is that a slipup, I was just trying to get the day moving by accusing people and when he said he wasn't mafia I just said OK, I believe you. Not as if I was saying, oh OK, I am 100% sure that MiasG is town and nobody should ever vote for him. If I was mafia then why would I say something so stupidly obvious on the 1st page that people can pick up on. Mafia are meant to lay low (like you have) and try to arouse as little suspicion as they can so that they can just glide through the days and pick off their targets at night.
However I don't think you're mafia because you are voting for me and the mafia always try to get people killed by jumping on bandwagons or by agreeing with things people have said and sticking their vote on them inconspicuously so that nobody picks up on it but then that person gets killed and if you were mafia, you wouldn't waste a vote on a person that isn't looking likely to get lynched.
I think Hippo has a good idea in that we should try to resolve this day pretty quickly because it's not really going anywhere so maybe the 3 suspects idea would be the best thing to do and we can all try to agree on who to lynch. I'm starting to waver on my suspicions about Mikeblue now, mainly because his stupid posts were just a bit too stupid and mafia would probably try to just have a reasoned defence to any points made about them so they stay under the radar. Oh and there's also the fact that 5 other people have voted for him which I'm sure is bandwagoning from some people. Therefore I will
unvote Mikeblue.
I was initially going to vote for Mophead but having read back on his posts I decided not to. To be fair, he does hardly ever post and when he does he never really says anything that contributes to the game and there was his post where he did basically claim mafia but that could've just been a joke like Amadjin's or something? On the other hand his vote for Mikeblue was back on Page 5 so can't really be a bandwagon and he has recently started to argue with people rather than try to defend himself rationally and if you were mafia then you'd want to stay low profile which would mean you don't make posts like his last one. He does have some evidence against him but he does have stuff for him as well so I'm inclined to think that he is pro-town at this point, however he definitely needs to post more.
It is quite hard to figure out who is mafia at the moment but I'm willing to bet that 1 mafia member is currently voting for Mikeblue just because of the bandwagon thing and the most suspicious person voting for Mikeblue at the moment, in my eyes, is Yorkshire Blue. He posted once on page 1 and then didn't post again till page 6. In that post on day 6 he picked out Mikeblue, Mophead, Bluestars and Footienewb. Fair enough as they did look suspicious but I am not so suspicious of Mike and Mophead now as you know from the above paragraph so maybe he was trying to pick on them because they are the most vulnerable and it would be easy to vote for 1 of them (he did eventually vote for Mikeblue) and get them killed. He then also jokingly FOS'd me for my "distracting avatar". Perhaps just trying to joke to avoid attention. He posts again on page 8 picking up on some stuff the Bluestars said and justifying his suspicion of the others from page 6. Again just doing the normal "townie" thing of backing up suspicions and trying to lay low under the radar not picking up much attention. Also I would like to point out he only posted 3 times in the first 9 pages. Make of that what you will.
On page 10 he finally votes for Mikeblue. His reasoning was a bit sketchy. He says he's "already posted enough reasons", when he had only posted 3 times in the last 9 pages and his only reason for being suspicious of Mikeblue was because he was "posting a lot of pointless crap". After all the other stuff that has made other look suspicious like Bluestars, Amadjin, Mophead etc. he votes for Mikeblue for that pretty sketchy reason and does so after 4 people have already voted for Mikeblue (trying to create a bandwagon?).
He then keeps picking up on small things that Mike has said trying to make out that he looks mafia (admittedly I did think Mikeblue was mafia for a while but having finally read back properly I think my reasoning was pretty stupid as well so read back a couple of paragraphs to see why I think I was wrong) possibly trying to get the bandwagon to form and get more people onboard. Mikeblue then voted for Yorkshire, perhaps because he picked up on the same stuff that I did.
Now, remember that Yorkshire only posted 3 times in the first 9 pages but from page 10 onwards he starts to post a lot more often and it's all focused on Mikeblue and trying to prove that he is mafia. He doesn't make any posts that would look too suspicious, he just tries to make Mike look really suspicious and Mike was the most vulnerable at this point because of the crap that he posted for a while so Yorkshire obviously thought he'd use that to try and get Mike lynched. In doing this he immediately takes his post tally from 3 after page 9 to about 12 after page 11. Then he stops posting again for a couple of pages and posts on page 14 stating the day is going on for too long and we need a deadline. Does that mean he wants to hurry the day up so he can get to the night phase and kill some people because it has been seen before that mafia try to hurry things along by getting a deadline imposed so that somebody dies.
He then doesn't post again till page 16 and in that post he just re-emphasises his thoughts on Mikeblue whilst also picking on vulnerable Mophead because of his shouting post.
Yorkshire definitely looks the most suspicious to me now so
Vote Yorkshire. The other 2 people that are most suspicious to me at the moment are Bluestars and MiasG. Bluestars because she has drastically changed her playing style, but then when that was picked up on she changed back and made a big stat post, and is barely posting (trying to stay under the radar?) and also because she hasn't voted for anybody yet so is obviously not really bothering to try and pick people out when there is a lot of stuff to go on at the moment.
As for MiasG. He didn't post till page 9 as he was away, fair enough, then he makes a huge post with all his suspicions which was good and votes for me. Then he doesn't post again until page 12 and that was only as a response to Mikeblue picking up on something he'd said and he immediately changed his vote to Mikeblue for basically no reason other than that he wanted to put pressure on me so voted me and then I replied with a satisfactory defence but Mike had picked up on something he'd said so immediately MiasG votes for him. Also, I'd like to point out that this was only MiasG's 2nd post and that Mikeblue already had 5 people voting for him so this could be a major bandwagon vote as he didn't have any justification as to his vote for Mike, he just seemed to do it because Mike said that he was suspicious. Then he has a little slanging match with Trick Pony which leads nowhere and when Trick Pony picks up on some small things he defends it by saying he was away for 3 days and retorts by trying to make TP look suspicious because he was emailing him at work to get him to post more.
Then Mike says that he made a tit for tat vote for him and his defence is that he is "allowed to vote for whoever he wants" and says that it looks like Mike wants him to vote for the vote leaders which Mike never said and wouldn't anyway because he is the vote leader! Just some really crappy reasoning in my eyes.
Then Steven suspects him and he doesn't defend himself but instead says that TP is suspicious because of the emails he'd sent and because he's going away for a few days. Surely by that reasoning MiasG himself would be suspicious as he went away for a while as well.
Then he posts again a bit later justifying his earlier voting for me but still he keeps his vote on Mike "because of his responses" which I have already pointed out is a pretty crappy reason for voting for someone and 5 people have voted for Mike beforehand, and Mike's responses were just that he looked suspicious.
Also on the page after that MiasG is mentioned quite a lot as looking suspicious by lots of people but he only responds to TP by saying he wants him to go away so he can concentrate on the game. Why does he not defend himself to the others and why does he only respond to TP?
Finally, he says that he is thinking about unvoting Mike and voting for me again (possibly trying to make an alliance with Axeman?) because of my posts in the deleted thread even though he'd already said that my justifications were good enough for him and that Mike was much more suspicious, so what changed?
Wow, that was an unbelievably big post
Basically my main suspicions are on Yorkshire and MiasG and I think they are both mafia but Yorkshire is a bit more suspicious in my eyes at the moment
Happy To Be Blue! the City Site...I need your help! feel free to write away on Player and manager profiles, season reviews, Match reports, post them and If we like, it will go in the database for as long as Happyaxeman.co.uk lives!