DAY3 of the current mafia game; Evil v Good... Estimated time left is a few days!New game starting after current one finishes...Sign up for it now!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
also i find it interesting that not long after wes says currie is attempting to get steve onboard,steve questions people for the accusations against currie...team play anyone??
Its still only early in the game but these peeps are still to post but were on the forum and available to post but failed to do so...they start hearing a beep in there head...Amadjin, Bluestars, LaserBlue, SteveVanHalenMikeblue's bleep is slightly lower because he has not been on whilst the game was open....I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THIS IS NOT A NORMAL MAFIA GAME. AS SUCH ITS NOT MAFIA YOUR TRYING TO FIND, ITS PLAYERS YOU THINK ARE NOT GOOD. VOTE COUNTCURRIEMAN x2 (WES, MIASG)
Nobody has yet explained why what he did is different than what i said in the post previous to his.. yet they've jumped on it.. ?? smacks of a group of evils trying to targe each other early on to create distance.. otherwise they would have jumped on my post as well.. instead of just curries..
Can someone explain again to me why currie is so sus? Because from what I'm reading, he said nearly the exact same thing that I said in the post preceeding his??
In my opinion, the 3 of you, MIASG, Wesmancity & Currieman are all sus... This could be the "lets attack each other early to distance our selves later on" trick..
email inbox said i had a personal message, i was on the site for all of a minute as i had my first exam this morning.NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GAMEso within the first page we have had two people vote for the same person instantly. you are either certain or in cahoots - evil or mason? axemans words in bold may hint that evil players may not neccessarily be a team therefore voting patterns may not be as easy to scrutinise ALREADY STATED
So first you say to us why we think Currie is sus and then you put Miasg, me and currie as being sus doesn't make sence Steve.Steve and a quote "This could be a lets attack each other to distance our selves later on trick"So are you implying that we have discussed this before the game has started? because i have not been given that option, and now you have brought it up you must of had this action why else would you know of a such role? you really are shit at being evil arnt you Steve?
Wow talk about twisting. Even if he was "implying" for you to jump to the conclusion that he knew this is a bit far fetched. And to be honest I don't think he did really imply that by what he said. Not saying Steve is good or bad but I think you deserve my vote for blatant twisting
I have haven't I? Ruffled??? No defence just abuse? Easy tiger....
nobody has answered why both Wes and MiasG went after me and not Steve when I said exactly the same as him!!
Also, do you really think that if Wes, MiasG and I were on the same team we'd be so stupid as to make ourselves so obvious early on like that? I don't know if those 2 are working together but it certainly does seem odd how they have formed their opinions so quickly (maybe trying to get a quick bandwagon lynch?).
I gave my idea.. you 3 are together and are using this as a diversionary tactic of some kind. wes then coming after me (showing that he had read my post, even quoted it), yet did not respond to my question..why did they go after currie and not me?? when I said basically the same thing...
would make sense i guess,but then the opposite could be true,thats the beauty of this game,never mind axes games lolpersonally i think il vote steve van halen as he rarely has an opinion will probably go down the same path once again this gamei like mikes 'guns blazing' style.....its akin to a pensioner doing the jive